Fisker Ocean Forum banner
1 - 13 of 13 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
414 Posts
Discussion Starter · #2 ·
There is a lot of good shots of the vehicle interior in this one. A couple points I noted, front headrests actually look like they have a seam now meaning they would be adjustable. A pretty good look at the central display, although it looks to still be pre-production quality. A decent shot of the cargo area as well. Sea salt interior looks pretty slick here IMO.
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
1,783 Posts
That video says the 'High Performance Version' will go 0-60 in 2.9 seconds. The Fisker website says 3.6 seconds.....Is the Extreme going to be faster than originally planned!? 0-60 in 2.9 is absolutely LUDICROUS for an SUV.

SIGN ME UP!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
259 Posts
When fisker says it that must be the range they should get or the EPA range. He might of actually slipped when saying it as he normally says 350+ range.

If you look when they sing shots of the dash it shows 350 at 100% SOC
 

·
Registered
Referral Code ZOQ017
Joined
·
1,255 Posts
Hard to take the presenter seriously when he says production will be in the US. He doesn't know why the screen has a horizontal mode. He starts with saying it's a big SUV, then later says it's not very big. No mention of AWD for the Ultra/Extreme. Do these guys ever research anything? It takes 3 minutes of blabbing until you get to the car. SMH.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gerry and KMBrown

·
Registered
Joined
·
414 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
That video says the 'High Performance Version' will go 0-60 in 2.9 seconds. The Fisker website says 3.6 seconds.....Is the Extreme going to be faster than originally planned!? 0-60 in 2.9 is absolutely LUDICROUS for an SUV.

SIGN ME UP!
Apparently the HP and 0-60 details are no longer on the website. If that means changes are being made, hopefully they will be good changes.
 

·
Registered
2018 Tesla Model 3 LR RWD
Joined
·
802 Posts
Craaaaaap! Okay, fine. I'm getting the Extreme.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
430 Posts
I feel like the 2.9 seconds to 60 was what Fisker proposed in 2020 or so, but then revised to 3.6. Maybe it's getting a revision back towards 2.9.

Like the host said, the cargo area looks like it has decent size but the floor is high. I do remember seeing somewhere that the production floor would be lower. I figure that means a not-flat load floor because they can't really make the bumper lower at this point. Perhaps an adjustable cargo floor.

And I figured the 390 miles range was for WLTP too. But maybe they revised up there too.
 

·
Registered
Referral Code ZOQ017
Joined
·
1,255 Posts
I feel like the 2.9 seconds to 60 was what Fisker proposed in 2020 or so, but then revised to 3.6. Maybe it's getting a revision back towards 2.9.

Like the host said, the cargo area looks like it has decent size but the floor is high. I do remember seeing somewhere that the production floor would be lower. I figure that means a not-flat load floor because they can't really make the bumper lower at this point. Perhaps an adjustable cargo floor.

And I figured the 390 miles range was for WLTP too. But maybe they revised up there too.
I really think the 390 miles is for WLTP. 390/1.11 = ~350

How about this for a rumor. The Extreme/One get 0-60 in 2.9 as a special surprise. That would get some people to upgrade over the Ultra.

There is a subfloor below the panel too.
Automotive tire Automotive lighting Automotive design Grille Automotive exterior
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
430 Posts
I really think the 390 miles is for WLTP. 390/1.11 = ~350

How about this for a rumor. The Extreme/One get 0-60 in 2.9 as a special surprise. That would get some people to upgrade over the Ultra.

There is a subfloor below the panel too.
View attachment 846
I remember Bjorn showing us that there was a subfloor. It looks to have decent storage. But someone somewhere said the final version will have a deeper/lower cargo space. Might have been in that same Bjorn video from Barcelona.
 
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
Top