So, how much monies (of $7.5 Billion)during a meeting with Biden adminstration yesterday or Monday to get some extra funding for building charging infrastructure
Don’t know about the US, but here is the info for Europe. Per Bjorn Nyland in Norway, Tesla is still cheaper than some of the providers.My assumption is that non-Teslas will pay a "premium" charging fee. It will likely be cheaper charging at other networks but good to know that the Tesla network would be available. This is especially the case in Mammoth Lakes, CA as it has a Tesla charger and the closest CCS location is 45 miles away in Bishop. (although there are only 8 stalls and it already has a backup on busy weekends so not sure how well it would go opening it up).
My concern is the charging port location. The Tesla charger cables are very short (considerably shorter than CCS locations). All Teslas have their charging port on the rear driver side. The Tesla charger would only reach vehicles that have the port on the rear driver side or front passenger side. The Ocean has the port on the front driver side so wouldn't be able to reach. Solutions would be to have a longer CCS cable than the Tesla cable or if they go CCS adapter to have an adapter with an extension. We will have to wait to see what they propose.
Where did you see this? I have noticed for both Tesla and Electrify America that it varies by state (I have not looked at other networks). While they charge by kWh in most states, there are certain states they charge by time (with different rates depending on the speed). The states that they charge by time is due to State regulations for utility provider which forbids the charging stations to charge by kWh unless registered as a utility provider.Also with Tesla they do not add amount of time Fee as that will become illegal to do so in a few more years. Cost for charging an EV will all be done by Kw rates with no time limit of charging fee.
Yes, charging by kWh or time is a state law issue relating to power generation regulation. My state changed from time to kWh a couple years ago.Where did you see this? I have noticed for both Tesla and Electrify America that it varies by state (I have not looked at other networks). While they charge by kWh in most states, there are certain states they charge by time (with different rates depending on the speed). The states that they charge by time is due to State regulations for utility provider which forbids the charging stations to charge by kWh unless registered as a utility provider.
That’s not how it works. You pay for the electricity by the minute without other fees. Sometimes they group it by charge rate. For example if you charge 60kW or slower you pay $0.15/min above it you pay $0.25/min. It was actually a little cheaper for me to supercharge when my state had the price per minute.Sorry mostly all the information I am finding on pricing is mostly for California lol. I did find that their are 30 states that have signed up for charge by Kw usage instead of per minute. Because if companies insist on charging per minute they will force people not to go electric as no one will want to pay the rate per minute on top of Kw charge rate. With EVs we lose range depending on a bunch of different variables. One of the main variables is weather if its cold you lose about 20 - 30% range right off the bat. So we need to charge more often.
Thanks for this correction. As I do not own an EV right now and I am in California I thought it was $.23 per Kw charged not a per minute guess once i get an EV i will find out one way or another. But I think here in California it is a straight price per Kw but I could be wrong maybe someone in California who has an EV can share on this but back to the original topic of Tesla allowing Supercharger access to other EVs.That’s not how it works. You pay for the electricity by the minute without other fees. Sometimes they group it by charge rate. For example if you charge 60kW or slower you pay $0.15/min above it you pay $0.25/min. It was actually a little cheaper for me to supercharge when my state had the price per minute.
The $0.23/kWh is a very old rate. Tesla no longer has standardize pricing but cost for California is now approx. $0.48/kWh. They do cut the rate to about half during late hours. Tesla prefers to charge by kWh; in States where they are forced to charge by the minute, they try to set up tiers so that the cost to charge is very similar to when they charge by kWh.Thanks for this correction. As I do not own an EV right now and I am in California I thought it was $.23 per Kw charged not a per minute guess once i get an EV i will find out one way or another. But I think here in California it is a straight price per Kw but I could be wrong maybe someone in California who has an EV can share on this but back to the original topic of Tesla allowing Supercharger access to other EVs.
I think Musk is doing the right thing as his network is substantially the more stable infrastructure. I think I did read that the V3 Superchargers are the only ones that will get converted to the CCS option. I think he also mentioned the V2 stations owners will probably need to have their own adaptor until he gets to updated all his stations to V3 which I am sure will happen but he needs to first finish building them all before updating will occur or until the overhaul of the V2 takes place.
I see we have the same car. What's you VIN? I'm 142XX from April 2018.The $0.23/kWh is a very old rate. Tesla no longer has standardize pricing but cost for California is now approx. $0.48/kWh. They do cut the rate to about half during late hours. Tesla prefers to charge by kWh; in States where they are forced to charge by the minute, they try to set up tiers so that the cost to charge is very similar to when they charge by kWh.
Tesla has three different chargers - V2 charges at 120-150 kW; V3 reach 250 kW and "Urban" chargers are 70-75 kW. They are no longer installing V2 chargers and 95%+ of all new chargers are V3. In the U.S., Tesla currently has 1,655 locations either open or under construction/permiting. Those locations have a total of 17,277 stall of which 9,867 are V3 stalls (57%). V3 are already over half their stalls and continue to grow quickly. If only V3s are adapted for CCS; they will still be the largest network in the U.S.
I do see them creating an adapter for people to buy - it will be a lot easier than converting 10k+ stalls. I can also see the adapter linking to the Tesla Account so it can charge you automatically and seamlessly when you connect.
If you want to see Supercharger info:
This is might impressive!Tesla currently has 1,655 locations either open or under construction..
Those locations have a total of 17,277 stall of which 9,867 are V3 stalls (57%)
Mine's a "newer" model - 207xx from May 2018.I see we have the same car. What's you VIN? I'm 142XX from April 2018.
It's all done on the app. Tesla is not putting any screens or credit card terminals on the superchargers - too much to go wrong and break over time. I've seen so many DCFC and L2 J1772 with broken screens to count. When I supercharge, the app and the car's screen shows the kWh and costs increasing as it goes in the car.The one downside is that their has to be some sort of screen on the chargers so people can see the charging and price. Now I am not sure if tesla will start putting screens on their chargers or it will just be thru their app but I think all charging places have to have some sort of visual display somewhere whether it is inside the car/ or app to be transparent on the charges and amount of electricity going into the vehicle and amount of time being used. At least here in California it is like that from that Bill 349 I think it was that passed 2 or 3 years ago.